Thanks. Richard Jenkins is a long time hero of mine.
The operating side of things is sorted. The cargo ferry will operate using little or no fossil fuel as it can sail in winds as low as 6 knots, will be solar powered when the sun is out and will not operate on routes where timetabling is strict (ie, no tourists or perishable cargo) so if there is no wind at night, it does not move. This is an unlikely scenario, particularly for the first one which will be operating on a trade wind route, mostly in daylight.
Compare this with the diesel guzzling freighters. Up to 60% of their income is spent on fuel, most of the rest on wages, leaving nothing for maintenance, which is why there are so many derelicts ships waiting to sink in the main harbours.
What I would like to discover is how the materials themselves compare, including production, the build process, maintenance, life expectancy and what happens at the end of their useful life. Then divide the answer by how many tonnes of cargo are carried how far by each vessel. The result may or may not be in favour of the cargo ferry, it will be interesting to see. It will probably end up as a university student's third year project, but experience has shown that it is better to have done the literature search before approaching them. Experience has also shown that there is not much you guys don't know, so you are my first stop.
The ply information is interesting, I will call ozbuild tomorrow and see if they have any comparative numbrs for other materials and/or more numbers for wood than the heavily biased carbon released/stored numbers.