<"To you and many other I'm just ignorant due to my lack of education."
No problem there. Everyone lacking education is ignorant of whatever it is that they aren't educated it. It's not a fault, and its an easy enough situation to remedy....and then to get credit for your work. But it's not so easy to convince others that book knowledge isn't valuable. If a subject interests you, go do the work to learn what others already know about it. Until then you're guessing. That's fun, but no more than that. Certainly not worth yelling about. And it doesn't get a boat built.
BTW, you are correct; there's a certain amount of interpretation in modeling. But assumptions aren't the same as guesswork. There's a baseline of knowledge implied. That baseline is what allows folks to share their work.
You sound like an intelligent guy, so why not go get some learning? Or as you put it, piss or get off the pot.
Roger L.
Apparently, Modeling is the interpretation of finding modelers own answer to a theory. To you and many other I'm just ignorant due to my lack of education. You, they will always cast that shadow on me its easiest way to discredit.
Lets see some of your work and others on here. Where is it why are all you hiding there work. I bring forth my experiences and share my knowledge good or bad where's yours?
What I'm saying if splitting hairs over a few centimeters here and there without even building a model of any size why bother. Whats the point? PISS OR GET OFF THE POT...
I shouldn't have said anything....You'd like that huh
tODD
--- In harryproa@yahoogroups.com.au, "Roger L" <rogerlov@...> wrote:
>
> Tsstproa, I agree and think you are on to something there, but the reason isn't simple. Although the numbers that are put into analysis are right and so are the answers......the truth is that the real world contains more variables than anyone can reasonably put in. We agree on that.
>
> I'm sure the guys in Top Gear know that and are just making that same point. I doubt that they are ignorant of the limitations of analysis or so full of themselves that they think if one car looks better than another on some limited paper analysis that it will perform better overall. I'm guessing that's not what they are trying to say. After all, it would be just plain uneducated thinking leading to a wrong conclusion......somehow the Top Gun guys don't seem that dumb to me.
>